Suit against Farmers a poor case of leadership
By John R. Cobarruvias
(printed in the Houston Chronicle Aug 22 2002)
Earlier this month, Gov. Rick Perry, Attorney General John Corny and
State Insurance Commissioner Jose Montemajor took time to hold a news conference
to announce the filing of a lawsuit against farmers Insurance. Although
the action is needed, it could have been avoided years ago when the issues
were first brought to their attention. Over the last few years, our elected
officials gave the insurance industry exactly what it wanted, and now,
this election year, they are getting exactly what they deserve.
These issues are not new. They were presented to elected officials in
detail over the last few years and yet they have continued to provide more
protection of the industry and nothing for the consumer. The insurance
crisis has been ongoing of years and the facts have been presented in a
number of forums.
In the first ever hearings on mold contamination held across the
state last year, Montemayor heard the testimony of hundreds of Texas homeowners,
as well as consumer groups, throughout Texas. Their stories contained the
same common thread, namely, abuse by the insurance industry, allegations
of possible price fixing, and rate manipulation. After all the hearings
and special ìmold task forceî the insurance commissioner provided relief
to the insurance industry by removing mold coverage and allowing the use
of new policies that excluded water and foundation damage. This is exactly
what the insurance industry wanted and it did absolutely nothing to protect
the consumer.
Prior to the hearings, Corny was asked by consumer groups to investigate
the building practices and materials that are susceptible to mold contamination.
This would have provided protection to consumers, as well as the insurance
industry, by mitigating the risk of mold contamination. It is only common
sense: If we reduce the likelihood of mold contamination and other water-related
damage, reducing the risk would protect the insurance industry. As a bonus,
consumers would be protected by better-built homes and by a reduction in
premiums. Instead, the attorney general began an investigation into third-party
adjuster and mold remediation companies. This was exactly what the insurance
industry wanted. Again, this did absolutely nothing for the consumer.
Perry, instead of recognizing and responding to the crisis, endorsed
the licensing of mold remediators and third party adjuster and then called
for yet more tort reform for the insurance industry as the solution to
the insurance crisis. This so-called tort reform would place limits on
the amounts consumers could sue an insurance company for, regardless of
the severity of the loss. This was exactly what the insurance industry
wanted, and, again, it did absolutely nothing for the consumer.
The filing of the lawsuit is not only ill timed, considering the facts
were available years ago and the close proximity to upcoming elections,
but it is truly frivolous. Cornyn, Montemayor and Perry had the opportunity
to resolve this situation without resorting to trial lawyers and the court
system. Consumer groups and homeowners who volunteered their time and money
to help expose the issues provided the facts in order to prevent abuse
and litigation. And now, with no action taken, the damage has already been
done and the only course of action remaining is a lawsuit.
Our state cannot hide behind a double standard of tort reform. If consumers
had filed this suit, it would have been deemed ìfrivolousî, yet when our
elected officials file the suit, it is considered ìleadershipî. And now
Gov. Perry is recommending more tort reform in liability caps to further
protect the same insurance companies he is filing a suit against.
Consumers are told over and over again that lawsuits to not solve anything.
But when the facts have been presented and good-faith negotiations with
the industry have resulted in no clear resolution, then a lawsuit is not
only necessary but welcomed. If found guilty, the industry should be justly
punished.